FCC Chairman Blesses Ortiz Speech F-Bomb as “from the heart”

David Ortiz Speech

We have been critical of the FCC from time to time, but for once we have to commend them. There are times when politics and the rulebook must be put aside to allow the emotional healing to proceed across the nation. David Ortiz‘s televised F-bomb during a short speech prior to their first game following the Boston Marathon bombing was one such moment.

The game and Big Papi’s speech was televised nationally and broadcast on local radio stations. The FCC could have fined the player for his outburst but chose to support him instead. In a Tweet, FCC Chairman Juluis Genachowski said, “David Ortiz spoke from the heart at today’s Red Sox game. I stand with Big Papi and the people of Boston – Julius”.

It was a classy move and one that was appreciated by the nation with over 6,000 retweets and nearly 2,000 favorites.


As the people of the world continue to ask questions, point fingers, and search for closure, it’s refreshing to see the response. They could have easily said nothing or even scolded the slugger but instead stood with him in his sentiment. In times like these, politicians often seize on the circumstances to push their agenda or grab the spotlight. In this case, Genachowski did the right thing.

Enhanced by Zemanta

North Korea is Apparently Targeting Colorado Springs, TX

North Korea Targeting Colorado Springs, Texas

It’s not prudent to take the threats of the North Koreans lightly as we mentioned in a previous post, but it’s hard to take them seriously when their computer generated graphics of their attack plan pinpoints Colorado Springs, the home of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), to be somewhere around the Texas/Louisiana border.

The graphic matches the map that was pictured behind leader Kim Jong-un last week in a propaganda image released to the media. At the time, it was assumed that they were targeting Texas but it is clear in the video that was released to the state-run media services that they were selecting Colorado Springs as their second target right after Washington DC. Here’s the video:

Enhanced by Zemanta

NBC’s Deceptive Editing is a Scar on Journalists

It has been widely covered already so there’s no need to rehash it too much other than to say this: what NBC has done and continues to do is bad for journalism and bad for the American people who rely on news channels to grasp what’s happening in our world.

This is nothing short of a political agenda being pushed with zero transparency or a willingness to report the news rather than manipulate it for their own goals. Fox News has done some manipulative things with the news. They all have. NBC is just much better at it and much more willing than other networks to warp the news to their liking. Check out the video from Hannity:

Enhanced by Zemanta

Naperville Smart Meters: 1984 is Finally Here

Naperville Smart Meters

It came three decades later than George Orwell fictitiously predicted, but the beginning of a controlled and monitored society is seeing more roots being planted in Naperville, IL. The citizens are being forced to accept wireless smart meters installed on their homes despite a wide outcry by the residents. Those who refused to allow the installers on their property during the initial round of installations were placed on a list and were met with police-escorted installers the second time around.

[Read more...]

Obama Wanted to Reduce Interest Paid on Federal Debt

National Debt Clock

The challenges facing Barack Obama were apparent before he took office. A month into his term, he acknowledged that the problems needed to be addressed immediately and stated that he wanted to halt the growth of the national debt, including reductions of the $250 billion in interest that were paid towards it the year before.

Since then, the numbers have continued to rise faster than he had hoped. Much faster.

Mitt Romney is not a Conservative

Ronald Reagan Flag

American politicians are supposed to be guided by the will of the people through an electorate that decides who will best represent their goals and fill the needs required of office. It can be said that going with what the people want is an asset and should be considered a strength. There are times, however, when personal passion and unwavering convictions are more important than the willingness to change.

Voters know this instinctively, which is why Mitt Romney hasn’t taken the commanding lead that his money and the support he receives from the Republican Establishment should be giving him. When someone’s voiced opinions change based upon the audience at the time, it means that either the opinions their voicing are false part of the time (you can’t live on both sides of any particular fence) or that the ability of a person to form opinions that make sense to them (and therefore the electorate) is missing.

Mitt Romney’s flips and flops are well documented, but that’s politics. A candidate must often put their words through a filter to fit the situation and actions tend to speak louder than words. However, there’s a statement that should disqualify Romney from ever being able to call himself a conservative. It’s one thing to change over time and become more conservative, but to go from an independent to moderate Republican and now to a conservative as he is claiming is simply not feasible. To claim to have changed that much over the years is either a lie or alarming if it’s true. America does not need a President with such weak convictions that they are able to tumble so easily.

We don’t need Mitt Romney.

Uninspiring: Mitt Romney’s Only Weapon is Money

Mitt Romney Vanilla

What was the biggest difference between Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush? Why did Bill Clinton pulverize Bob Dole despite having personal moral challenges in his way after his first term? How did a relative newcomer to the political stage beat a the solid track record of John McCain?

The answer to all three questions is the same. One inspired people. The other did not.

Reagan, Clinton, and Obama all had the ability to make people weep. They could move a room, get people excited, and make their opponents’ blood boil. Bush, Dole, and McCain were uninspiring, but even they got more of a rise out of people than Mitt Romney.

There’s a reason why Romney abandoned his early campaign strategy of playing like a winner and attacking Obama. It wasn’t working. The soundbites were weak and the passion seemed insincere. When it became apparent that he wasn’t gaining support, he turned to the one asset that gives him a clear edge – attack funds.

With cash in hand, Romney switched gears after the South Carolina debates and outspent the field six-fold with attack ads aimed at the previous primary winner in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich. Now, the money is shifting towards Rick Santorum after his recent victories.

Romney’s inability to gain passionate supporters who desperately want him to win is the reason that he would not be able to defeat Obama. He may end up being the choice by default if Gingrich and Santorum continue to split the conservative vote and Ron Paul is unable to advance beyond his frenzied but small base. A lukewarm choice in the primaries means a loss in November.

The Republican Establishment has made another mistake in their anointment of Romney. They saw him as the safe bet, the one who could most-likely pull moderate votes. In their eyes, Gingrich is a wild card, Santorum is too conservative to pull moderates, and Paul is insane. The reality is that any of the three would have a better shot against Obama because they have the one attribute that is absolutely required for victory. They have flavor.

Romney is vanilla. That’s not to say he’s boring. He requires a topping to taste better, and therein lies his weakness. The toppings seem to change depending on who he wants to be on a particular day. In 1994, he said he wasn’t trying to return to Reagan/Bush. Now, he’s claiming to be a Reagan conservative.

Money is the only thing he has in his arsenal. It’s the only reason he took down Gingrich in Florida and it’s the only thing that can slow down Santorum’s momentum. Unfortunately for the Republican Party, it has a good chance of working during the primaries but it won’t be enough to help him in November if he gets the nomination. Obama would use the money against him and defeat him worse than he defeated McCain.

The video below shows the most passion that can come from the man. It’s clear that he felt very strongly back then about not wanting to be associated with conservatism.

Obama’s Deficit Reduction Promise, February 23, 2009

Barack Obama

Bold statements and lofty promises are best made during campaigns and at the beginning of a second Presidential term. In the beginning of a first term in those first few months after taking office, the statements and pledges must be achievable.

As the Barack Obama rolls out his election-year budget, it’s clear that the national debt will be $1 trillion higher in a decade than forecast. This is a stark contrast to what he said a month into his term as President:

The Answer We’re Going to Hear from Romney for Months About Cayman Money Stashing

Cayman Bank

The answer gets better and better the more he practices it.

Mitt Romney, stuck explaining away why he has money “stashed away” in the Cayman Islands, has a very strong answer for his critics. It’s a well-rehearsed response but no matter what he says about it, chances are it will continue to follow him around until he’s out of the running.

The answer is a good one. It makes sense. The only problem with it (and the question that nobody is posing) regards the sincerity of his intentions. Putting his money in a blind trust is smart, but even blind trusts can be established in ways that are guided by ideological principals worthy of the most powerful person in the world. What he should have done when setting it up is set running orders to keep the investments as clean, transparent, and American as possible.

At a certain point, riches become simple numbers. The difference in lifestyle between $100 million and $300 million is minimal. Someone with political ambitions are expected to be more American, more patriotic than their peers. Romney’s lack of a filter on his blind trust shows his allegiance to money was stronger than his allegiance to his country.

Here’s the video via Buzzfeed.

(Via: Buzzfeed. H/T: Pensacola Honda)

3 Reasons Why Democrats Are Drooling Over the Santorum Rise in Iowa

Santorum

While it’s still likely that Romney or Paul will win Iowa, Rick Santorum has made a statement by surging at the right moment in the polls. He has put nearly all of his efforts into winning Iowa, spending 101 days there. Michele Bachmann is a distant second with 79 days in the Buckeye state.

Democrats are loving it. There are three things about Santorum’s rise that bode well for them in the general election.

  1. Continued Uncertainty – If the Republican race comes down to two people as it did early in for the Democrats in 2008, the likely candidate will emerge more quickly. A 3- or 4-person race keeps the attacks coming from multiple directions, allowing Democrats to build up funds and hold their own campaigning at bay for as long as possible. The longer it drags out for the Republicans, the better it will be for the Democrats. Any hope, even a glimmer, that someone can challenge Romney and Paul would prolong the Democrats advantage.
  2. The Insurance Agent Image – Newt Gingrich appears to be a bold strategist on stage. Mitt Romney appears to be a shrewd economics guru. Ron Paul appears to be the voice of logic through radical thought. Rick Santorum appears to be the guy who sold you your life insurance. His image as perceived by the American people will have a hard time against the Obama charisma.
  3. He Doesn’t Debate Well – There’s a difference between someone who is well-spoken and articulate versus someone who compels passion. Rick Santorum’s words are strongly rooted in the conservative thinking that many Republicans want, but his stage-presence is mediocre at best. Only Rick Perry does worse going head-to-head with his competitors.

CBS discusses the rise of Santorum as the man of the hour. Will it take him to a strong showing in Iowa?